top of page

Featured Articles from our Online Division

Our Online Journal features original pieces edited by our Online staff at Bristol. They are not representative of any views held by the Bristol Law Review Editorial Board.

B4D5C973-011D-4252-9207-3759AC7313E8_edi

Eleni Konstantinidou  -  2025

The Supreme Court's decision in Philipp v Barclays saw the abolishment of the Quincecare duty, marking a change from a standard duty of care principle to an agency basis. This decision has left sole bank account customers unprotected against APP fraud, presenting a significant lacuna of implications.

download_edited.jpg

Sam Allibone - 2021

Runner-up to Bristol Law Review and University of Bristol Bar Society essay competition 2021, sponsored by Brick Court Chambers, Sam Allibone presents her fresh views on how the law should respond to racial inequalities. 

Blanch_reflection.jpg

Mark Ngu   -   2023

In this blog post, we will be considering some unusual royal ‘ownership laws’ of the United Kingdom and the implications for our common law system. While we may have Thanksgiving Turkey and Christmas Goose, why not St. Patrick’s Day Swan?

download_edited.jpg

Tochi Ejimofo - 2021

As part of the Bristol Law Review and University of Bristol Bar Society essay competition 2021, sponsored by Brick Court Chambers, Tochi Ejimofo presents her fresh views on how the law should respond to racial inequalities. 

B4D5C973-011D-4252-9207-3759AC7313E8_edi

Eleni Konstantinidou  -  2024

The Supreme Court's decision in Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd proved restorative towards the criticised principle established in Abouloff v Openheimer Co, on fraud as a defence to the enforcement of judgments. I Abouloff's landmark status upheld or in need of reform? 

bottom of page